|
Seventeen years or so ago, as a
shadow transport minister, I helped prepare a transport strategy
for Labour in the event of getting a Labour government.
That strategy was for all travel and transport to be integrated
including cycling and walking. This wasn't to say everyone should
cycle everywhere all of the time but where it made sense, that
option should be included.
My role involved me attending lots
of meetings and discussions, including speaking at the opening of
a major cycling conference in Switzerland where the local council
had just completed a cycle route after many years of campaigning.
"What we do, we do for our grandchildren, not our children," said
the chairman of the council in his attempt to explain that some
things just cannot be achieved overnight. They require time.

In the meantime I have kept up the
pressure to get cycling into Stoke-on-Trent. I organised an
initial meeting with the Council and Sustrans at the North
Stafford Hotel and out of that came the initiative to secure some
funding for national millennium routes through Stoke on Trent.
I organised meeting after meeting
with the then highway officials who believed that travel was
transport was highways and that funding should be spent
exclusively on highways. Having worked hard to persuade our
government to introduce funding for safe routes to school, and
seen how some areas had used that funding to encourage some
children to cycle safely to school, I could not accept that it was
okay for some areas to do that but not here in Stoke on Trent.
All of this is water under the
bridge. Suffice to say that that argument has finally been won. If
it makes sense to encourage certain journeys by bike, lets go for
it. If we can use parts of the greenway and offer cycling
stretches, why not?
In the last year
it
has seemed that after many years of trying, we really have
something to celebrate.

First there was the announcement by
government that Stoke-on-Trent's cycling bid has been approved.
All in all, including a contribution from the Council, there will
be £10 million to spend on encouraging cycling, mostly with new
government money. Compared to the amount spent on highways it is
small, but it is a huge boost for cycling.
Already though there have been the
predictable arguments that this will effectively be a waste of
money. But compared to the national average, the numbers of people
cycling to work for example is just 1.4% compared to the national
average of 3.1%. This money will help us get people using bikes
more - for work or leisure.
Then, just off Route 55 at Burnwood
Primary, I was thrilled to attend the opening of the new cycling
track. This was phase 2 of a long term
vision
to introduce youngsters to safe cycling. Headteacher Dianne
Herbert has acted as a true ambassador for cycling. Having won
the argument on Safe Routes to School to include cycling, her
school now has a cycle track, cycles, and is working with Cycling
Great Britain to link the pupils to cycling initiatives. In doing
so, attitudes are being transformed as pupils gain confidence and
Burnwood is being heralded as a beacon of good practice. So much
for the early protestations that cycling had no place in local
policies.
I have bee
utilising the cycle routes myself and I was able to catch
up with a

large group of families off on
a family cycle ride from Ford Green to Biddulph Grange. Through
small steps like this we can promote awareness about the part
cycling can play if only we have the appropriate facilities.
Stoke on Trent Council can be proud of the praise from John
Grimshaw, Director of Sustrans, who, when he opened the Route 55
track, said that its standard of construction was one of the
highest that he had seen anywhere in the country.
There
will always be those who will resist any expenditure on cycling,
there will be those like Fred Hughes who are right to question
whether the extra money
we
have won will be well spent. The answer is not to close the door
to cycling. It is to work with enthusiasts like the children at
Burnwood to see what
contribution cycling, along with all other investment into other
modes of transport, can make to integrated travel, leisure and
health policies in our city.
We
can't legislate for cycling. And no one is suggesting that it is
the answer to all the traffic problems in the city. But it does
have a part to play.
Back to Cycling
Poll |